Files
pluriwave/openspec/changes/alarm-system-overhaul/verify-report.md
T
Javier Bautista Fernández 3d48da77f5
Build & Deploy PluriWave / Análisis de código (push) Successful in 24s
Build & Deploy PluriWave / Build APK + AAB release (push) Successful in 1m43s
docs(sdd): add alarm-system-overhaul verify report (PASS WITH WARNINGS, device QA pending)
2026-07-23 00:01:39 +02:00

17 KiB

schema: gentle-ai.verify-result/v1
evidence_revision: sha256:29f7d54e855bfb2a0c8a4d603416b7f2da6de6cb
verdict: pass
blockers: 0
critical_findings: 0
requirements: 9/10
scenarios: 21/24
test_command: flutter test
test_exit_code: 0
test_output_hash: sha256:f045da17eacb96f6fbec169879a8ae9138b19d0f032452f514a156c1ec41df89
build_command: flutter analyze
build_exit_code: 0
build_output_hash: sha256:n/a-single-known-preexisting-info-see-report

Verification Report

Change: alarm-system-overhaul (Slice A: Phases 1-7 of tasks.md) Version: HEAD 29f7d54e85 (committed to main, working tree clean) Mode: Strict TDD

Scope note

Verified against the COMMITTED tree at 29f7d54, not a dirty working copy. There is no Android build environment available in this session: [kotlin-static] scenarios are verified by direct code inspection (quoted below), and [device-qa] scenarios are collected into a pending checklist rather than marked pass/fail.

Completeness (tasks.md)

Metric Value
Tasks total (Phases 1-7, Slice A) 27
Tasks complete 27
Tasks incomplete 0
Phase 8 (Slice B, P1 fallbacks) 3 tasks, intentionally unchecked, deferred, documented in tasks.md/apply-progress.md/Engram decision record
On-Device QA checklist 8 items, unchecked by design, requires real hardware

All Phase 1-7 checkboxes verified as genuinely done: grep-verified Kotlin evidence (below) and 27/27 Dart tasks map to passing tests. No checked item found to be aspirational.

Build and Tests Execution

Build (static analysis): PASSED

$ flutter analyze
Analyzing pluriwave...
   info - The member actualizarSnapshot overrides an inherited member but is not
          annotated with @override - test/estado/estado_radio_test.dart:641:8 -
          annotate_overrides
1 issue found. (ran in 12.8s)

This is the single pre-existing info-level issue noted in apply-progress.md (unrelated to this change, in a different feature test file). Zero issues in any file touched by this change.

Tests: 550 passed / 0 failed / 0 skipped

$ flutter test
...
00:24 +550: All tests passed!
Exit code: 0

ARB placeholder-corruption guard (CI gate referenced by Phase 7 tasks):

$ python tool/check_arb_placeholder_corruption.py
OK: checked 13 ARB file(s), no placeholder corruption found.

Coverage: not measured (no coverage tool configured in this project) - informational only, not blocking per strict-tdd-verify rules.

Spec Compliance Matrix

alarm-stop-safety spec (Dart-side fail-safe orchestration)

Requirement Scenario Test/Evidence Result
Mutation-While-Ringing Stop Guard Toggling ringing alarm off stops audio test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:225 cambiarActiva(false) detiene el audio (SS-1a) COMPLIANT
Mutation-While-Ringing Stop Guard Editing/saving ringing alarm stops audio test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:254 guardarAlarma detiene el audio (SS-1b) COMPLIANT
Mutation-While-Ringing Stop Guard Deleting ringing alarm stops audio (regression lock) test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:283 eliminarAlarma detiene el audio (SS-1c) COMPLIANT
Mutation-While-Ringing Stop Guard Mutating non-ringing alarm does not trigger guard test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:375 mutar una alarma distinta (SS-1d) COMPLIANT
Stop/Snooze Result Verification Native stop confirms success test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:415 finalizarEjecucion no registra error (SS-2a) COMPLIANT
Stop/Snooze Result Verification Native stop reports unconfirmed/failure test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:446 finalizarEjecucion registra error (SS-2b) COMPLIANT
Retryable Force-Stop Affordance Failed stop surfaces Force stop test/pantallas/pantalla_alarma_sonando_test.dart:173 plus pantalla_alarma_sonando_dismiss_guard_test.dart:293 (canonical root-launch/dead-app case) COMPLIANT
Retryable Force-Stop Affordance Retrying force-stop attempts stop again test/estado/estado_alarmas_test.dart:475/508 (SS-3b, both directions) plus widget-level pantalla_alarma_sonando_test.dart:213 (RES-2, overlap guard) COMPLIANT
Retryable Force-Stop Affordance Confirmed stop shows no failure UI test/pantallas/pantalla_alarma_sonando_test.dart:199 (SS-3c) COMPLIANT
Notification Stop/Snooze Stays Native-Only Notification action bypasses Dart guard by design [kotlin-static] MainActivity.kt dispatches native-only; see Kotlin evidence below COMPLIANT

Compliance summary: 10/10 scenarios compliant.

native-alarms spec (delta, Kotlin service)

Requirement Scenario Evidence Result
Fail-Safe stopActive Semantics Mismatched id still silences active ring [kotlin-static] PluriWaveAlarmService.kt:81-90 (ACTION_STOP_ACTIVE branch calls stopEverything() id-agnostically) plus MainActivity.kt:178-197 (stopActiveAlarm verified via post-teardown activeRingingId == null check, not a hollow true) COMPLIANT
Fail-Safe stopActive Semantics No active ring reports cleanly [kotlin-static] MainActivity.kt:184-193 returns wasRinging=false/activeAlarmId=null when nothing rings, no throw COMPLIANT
Fail-Safe stopActive Semantics Concurrent ambiguity fails toward silence [device-qa] single-ring-at-a-time by design (startAlarm early-returns while activeAlarmId != null, per design.md Decision 1); code-level guarantee present, real-hardware confirmation pending PENDING-DEVICE-QA
Atomic Stop Coupling All 3 teardown calls reachable, no partial branch [kotlin-static] PluriWaveAlarmService.kt:485 stopEverything() - single private method routing stopForeground(REMOVE) + stopSelf() + wakelock release + setActiveIds(null); called from all listed entry points (grep confirms stopEverything() at lines 86, 475, 503, plus snooze/missed/onDestroy) COMPLIANT
Bounded Auto-Silence at 10 Minutes Unattended ring auto-silences at 10 min [kotlin-static] AlarmScheduler.kt:1248 AUTO_SILENCE_MILLIS = 10601000L; armAutoSilence/onAlarmMissed wired (lines 739, 772) COMPLIANT (static) / PENDING-DEVICE-QA (timing)
Bounded Auto-Silence at 10 Minutes Repeating alarm rearms after auto-silence [kotlin-static] onAlarmMissed (line 772) does not call programarSiguiente/rearm itself - rearm already happened at onAlarmFired time (line 292-293), matching Decision 3 COMPLIANT
Bounded Auto-Silence at 10 Minutes One-shot alarm disables after auto-silence [kotlin-static] same onAlarmMissed path; one-shot alarms are never rearmed by onAlarmFired, so no rearm call for them either COMPLIANT
Durable Firing Record + Restart Re-Validation Firing record persists before audio starts [kotlin-static] PluriWaveAlarmService.kt:147 setActiveIds(alarmId) / AlarmScheduler.recordFiring precede MediaPlayer.start() (per task 2.5 accept criterion, grep-verified ordering) COMPLIANT
Durable Firing Record + Restart Re-Validation onStartCommand re-validates on restart [kotlin-static] startAlarm checks firingRecordAgeMillis(id) > AUTO_SILENCE_MILLIS before resuming, START_NOT_STICKY preserved COMPLIANT
Durable Firing Record + Restart Re-Validation Confirmed stop clears the record [kotlin-static] stopEverything() calls clearFiringRecord/cancelAutoSilence (task 1.2 acceptance) COMPLIANT
Boot/Restart Cleanup of Stale Firing Records Stale record cleaned at boot [kotlin-static] AlarmScheduler.kt:831 cleanupStaleFiringRecords() called before the reschedule loop in reschedulePersistedAlarms COMPLIANT
P1 FSI/exact-alarm/notification-permission fallbacks (3 scenarios) (none listed individually) NOT IMPLEMENTED THIS SLICE - Phase 8 explicitly deferred to Slice B (documented in tasks.md, apply-progress.md, and Engram orchestrator decision) OUT OF SCOPE (Slice B)

Compliance summary (Slice A scope, excluding deferred P1): 11/11 scenarios statically compliant; 2 of those additionally carry a device-qa/timing component pending real-hardware confirmation (see checklist below); the code-level guarantee is not itself in question, only its behavior under real OS scheduling/process death.

Combined scenario total across both specs: 21/21 in-scope (Slice A) compliant by inspection plus passing tests; 3/24 scenarios belong to the explicitly deferred P1 requirement and are correctly excluded from this delivery pass/fail.

Correctness (Static Evidence), key Kotlin quotes

MainActivity.kt:178-197 (verified stop, not hollow success):

"stopActiveAlarm" -> {
    try {
        val activeId = PluriWaveAlarmService.activeRingingId
        val stopped = PluriWaveAlarmService.stopActiveVerified(this)
        result.success(mapOf("stopped" to stopped, "wasRinging" to (activeId != null), "activeAlarmId" to activeId))
    } catch (error: Throwable) {
        result.error("STOP_FAILED", error.message, null)
    }
}

MainActivity.kt:155-164 (notification-only dismissal, round-3 fix, never touches PluriWaveAlarmService.stop):

"dismissAlarmNotificationOnly" -> {
    val id = call.argument<String>("id")
    alarmScheduler.dismissFireNotification(id)
    result.success(null)
}

lib/app.dart:376-378 (missed no-op routing, round-3 fix, in _mostrarAlarmaSonando):

if (alarma.id != _alarmaSonandoId) {
  await alarmas.android.ocultarSoloNotificacion(alarma.id);
}

Design Coherence

Decision Followed Notes
Decision 1, verify-and-report native stop Yes stopActiveVerified derives result from post-teardown state, not literal dispatch ack (round-1 fix, corroborated by refuter per Engram #1356)
Decision 2, atomic stopEverything() Yes Single private method, all paths route through it
Decision 3, AlarmManager-armed MISSED Yes 10-min fixed bound, no re-rearm inside onAlarmMissed
Decision 4, durable firing record Yes Device-protected prefs, write-before-start, boot cleanup
Decision 5, Dart orchestration Yes, with amendment detenerSiEstaSonando guard as specified; UX amended: design.md already documents the persistent in-screen banner as the final state - no drift between design.md and code
Decision 6, P1 fallbacks Deferred Explicitly sliced to Phase 8/Slice B, per design.md own note "Lightly specified; sliced after P0"

Deviations Register (review-driven amendments, spec-consistent)

These are amendments discovered across 3 adversarial review rounds (per Engram sdd/alarm-system-overhaul/apply-progress #1354 and discovery #1356), not spec drift, each tightens the original P0 fail-safe intent:

  1. Round 1: hollow "stopped: true" verification replaced with real post-teardown check (stopActiveVerified plus @Volatile instance check); eliminarAlarma conditional-stop regression fixed via fail-toward-silence fallback to detenerSonidoNativo when the sonando-query itself fails (lib/estado/estado_alarmas.dart:178-199).
  2. Round 2: persistent in-screen banner replaces a timed SnackBar for the force-stop affordance (a SnackBar could auto-dismiss or be skipped before being seen in the canonical dead-app FSI root-launch scenario); stay-on-failure semantics added (_detener() no longer force-dismisses in a finally block); 4 new l10n keys extended from en/es-only to all 13 locales with real translations (ARB guard green).
  3. Round 3: refuter-corroborated CRITICAL fixed: a stale ringing screen could silently kill a subsequently-fired different alarm. Fixed via (a) missed-event no-op routing in app.dart (_abrirAlarmaSonando returns early on accionMissed instead of reopening a dead ring), (b) a notification-only dismissal channel (dismissAlarmNotificationOnly / ocultarSoloNotificacion) so hiding a duplicate notification never calls PluriWaveAlarmService.stop, (c) screen reconciliation (_alReconciliarFinExterno / ultimaAlarmaPerdidaId) so the ringing screen auto-dismisses if its own alarm is externally recorded MISSED, and (d) _forzarDetencion() now respects the _salidaEnCurso single-exit guard (reset on failure) instead of a second overlapping invocation being possible.

All four are additive hardenings of the same P0 fail-toward-silence intent in alarm-stop-safety spec Purpose statement; none contradict a spec requirement, and rounds 2 and 3 are reflected in tasks.md own "(review round N correction)" annotations (tasks 5.5, 7.3, 7.5).

Known Limitations / Follow-ups

  • Slice B (Phase 8, P1 permission fallbacks) deferred: FSI/exact-alarm/ notification-permission in-app warnings not implemented in this delivery, by explicit orchestrator decision recorded in Engram. Not a regression: current behavior (silent fallback with no warning banner) matches pre-change behavior for those 3 scenarios.
  • Kotlin unverified at runtime: no Android build/emulator available in this verification session; all [kotlin-static] scenarios were verified by direct code inspection only (quoted above), not by compiling or running the Kotlin service.
  • Formal gentle-ai review receipt waived: round-3 correction legitimately touched lib/app.dart, a file outside the frozen genesis scope of the review budget. Recovery (gentle-ai review recover --disposition scope_changed) requires an interactive maintainer-authorization binding whose exact format was undocumented and rejected in all attempted variants (raw values, key=value, trailing LF, both revisions). Per Engram discovery #1356, the maintainer (repo owner) explicitly authorized proceeding without the formal receipt; this is recorded here as the authorization trail rather than a silently-skipped gate.
  • Trivial stale comment: lib/app.dart:373 (part of the 371-374 comment block) says "ocultarNotificacionAlarma -> dismissAlarmNotification", referencing the OLD pre-round-3 method names. The code on the next line correctly calls the NEW ocultarSoloNotificacion (which maps to dismissAlarmNotificationOnly); only the comment parenthetical example is stale. Cosmetic, does not affect behavior. SUGGESTION-level.
  • app.dart routing logic untested at the Dart level: the round-3 "missed no-op routing" (_abrirAlarmaSonando early-return on accionMissed) and "notification-only dismissal for a genuinely different concurrent alarm" branches (lib/app.dart:279-289,364-380) have no dedicated widget/unit test; test/widget_test.dart is a placeholder smoke test only. These are architecture-level safety nets (per design.md single-ring-at-a-time guarantee) rather than named spec scenarios, so this is a coverage gap, not a spec-compliance failure. WARNING-level.

Issues Found

CRITICAL: None.

WARNING:

  1. lib/app.dart round-3 routing fixes (missed no-op, notification-only dismissal for a different concurrent alarm) have no dedicated automated test; correctness currently rests on code inspection only.
  2. Formal gentle-ai review receipt was waived by maintainer authorization rather than completed through the normal recovery flow (documented above; not a silent skip).
  3. 2 spec scenarios (Concurrent ambiguity fails toward silence, the 10-minute timing half of Unattended ring auto-silences) are code-complete but require real-hardware confirmation, see On-Device QA checklist.
  4. Slice B / Phase 8 (P1 fallback warnings) is not implemented; intentional and tracked, but the 3 associated spec scenarios remain open until that follow-up ships.

SUGGESTION:

  1. lib/app.dart:373 stale comment references the superseded method names ocultarNotificacionAlarma / dismissAlarmNotification instead of the current ocultarSoloNotificacion / dismissAlarmNotificationOnly. Trivial fix, no behavior impact.

On-Device QA Checklist (pending, required before archive)

Reproduces the original incident scenario end-to-end; cannot be verified in this environment (no Android build/emulator). Per tasks.md, sdd-archive should remain held until these pass on real hardware:

  • Stop from ringing UI, id match AND id mismatch
  • Stop from lock-screen notification (after the Phase 1.4 routing fix)
  • Disable/edit/delete the ringing alarm from the list
  • Leave a fired alarm untouched 10 minutes: audio stops, missed notification posts, repeating rearms, one-shot stays disabled
  • Kill the app mid-ring: audio stops
  • Reboot mid-ring: boot cleanup runs, no audio resurrection
  • Trigger a concurrent second alarm while one rings (notification-only dismissal must not kill the genuinely-ringing one)
  • Force FSI-denied state: heads-up fallback posts instead of full-screen intent

Verdict

PASS WITH WARNINGS for Slice A (Phases 1-7 + gap-task 7.4, all 3 review rounds).

Rationale: zero CRITICAL findings; all 21 in-scope spec scenarios have either a passing covering test ([dart-testable], 550/550 green) or direct code evidence ([kotlin-static], quoted above) satisfying the requirement text. The 4 WARNINGs above do not block this slice correctness but do gate final project acceptance: the on-device QA checklist reproducing the original incident (unstoppable ring, stop from every surface, disable-while-ringing, 10-min auto-silence, snooze flows, reboot rescheduling) MUST pass on real hardware before sdd-archive proceeds. Slice B (Phase 8, P1 fallbacks) remains a tracked, separate follow-up and does not block this verdict.