FreeTLab
bccc5c48b8
Persist the exploration, proposal, spec, design, tasks, and verify/archive reports produced during the multi-device EQ, alarm-countdown, and notification-visual-polish SDD cycles.
6.9 KiB
Verify Report: notification-visual-polish
Verdict: PASS WITH WARNINGS
Mode
Standard verify (no Strict TDD gate applicable to this change's Kotlin surface — no JVM/Robolectric harness exists in-repo; Dart surface followed TDD RED-GREEN-REFACTOR per tasks.md Phase 2, confirmed by apply-progress).
Completeness Table (Tasks)
| Phase | Tasks | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Foundation (drawable + brand constant) | 1.1, 1.2 | 2/2 complete |
| 2. Dart Wiring (TDD) | 2.1-2.4 | 4/4 complete |
| 3. Kotlin Wiring | 3.1-3.4 | 4/4 complete |
| 4. Manual/On-Device QA | 4.1-4.7 | 0/7 — intentionally unchecked, documented as pre-merge human gate |
| 5. Verification | 5.1-5.3 | 3/3 complete |
17/17 in-scope (automatable) tasks complete. 7/7 Phase 4 tasks correctly left unchecked with explicit "SKIPPED (manual QA)" annotations — not silently dropped.
Build / Test / Analyze Evidence (executed live during this verify pass)
flutter test— 240 tests passed, 0 failed (matches apply-progress claim exactly).flutter test test/tema/notification_color_test.dart(isolated) — 2/2 passed:AudioServiceConfig usa el color de marca(pre-existing, unaffected)AudioServiceConfig usa el icono monocromo de marca(new, covers both spec scenarios)
flutter analyze— No issues found.flutter build/ Gradle compile — not run (correctly out of scope; flagged as WARNING below, not CRITICAL).git status --porcelain— diff set matches design.md File Changes exactly: 5 modified (AlarmScheduler.kt,PluriWaveAlarmReceiver.kt,PluriWaveAlarmService.kt,lib/main.dart,test/tema/notification_color_test.dart) + 2 new (NotificationBrand.kt,ic_stat_pluriwave.xml). No scope creep.
Spec Compliance Matrix
| Requirement / Scenario | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement: Audio Notification Icon Resource | PASS | lib/main.dart:27 sets androidNotificationIcon: androidNotificationIconResource |
| Scenario: Audio notification config declares the branded monochrome icon | PASS | Test asserts androidNotificationIcon == 'drawable/ic_stat_pluriwave' — passed at runtime |
| Scenario: Audio notification icon is distinct from the default launcher fallback | PASS | Test asserts isNot('mipmap/ic_launcher') — passed at runtime |
Both scenarios are covered by a single test block with 2 assertions, executed and confirmed passing. 1/1 normative requirement satisfied.
Correctness Table (Source Inspection)
| Item | Expected (design.md) | Actual | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
ic_stat_pluriwave.xml |
24x24dp vector, graphic_eq pathData, #FFFFFF fill, no android:tint |
Exact match, well-formed XML (validated via XML parser) | YES |
NotificationBrand.kt |
object NotificationBrand { @ColorInt const val CYAN: Int = 0xFF21D4D9.toInt() }, package es.freetimelab.pluriwave |
Exact match; docblock mirrors AlarmNotificationStrings precedent style |
YES |
PluriWaveAlarmReceiver.kt:184-185 |
.setSmallIcon(R.drawable.ic_stat_pluriwave) + .setColor(NotificationBrand.CYAN) |
Confirmed at exact lines | YES |
AlarmScheduler.kt:580-581 |
Same pattern | Confirmed at exact lines | YES |
PluriWaveAlarmService.kt:390-391 |
Same pattern | Confirmed at exact lines | YES |
| No new imports (same-package R/NotificationBrand access) | Required by design | Confirmed — all 3 files + NotificationBrand.kt share package es.freetimelab.pluriwave |
YES |
lib/main.dart const wiring |
androidNotificationIconResource const + androidNotificationIcon field on configuracionAudioService |
Confirmed at lines 17, 27 | YES |
test/tema/notification_color_test.dart |
New test asserting icon field, 2 assertions | Confirmed, both assertions present and passing | YES |
All 8 source-inspection checks pass. Icon uses R.drawable.ic_stat_pluriwave (not android.R.drawable.*) at all 3 Kotlin call sites — correctly moved off the framework fallback icons (ic_dialog_info, ic_lock_idle_alarm).
Design Coherence Table
| Design Decision | Implemented As Specified |
|---|---|
Single hand-authored <vector> XML (no PNG/mipmap tooling) |
YES |
Material graphic_eq glyph, Apache-2.0 |
YES |
NotificationBrand object mirrors AlarmNotificationStrings precedent |
YES |
Same cyan (0xFF21D4D9) across all 3 alarm builders (no per-channel color split) |
YES |
Dart named const (androidNotificationIconResource) matches notificationColor: PluriWaveTokens.brand established pattern |
YES |
| No migration/schema/channel changes | YES — confirmed, diff is additive + presentation-only |
No design deviations found.
Issues
CRITICAL
None.
WARNING
- No native build/compile verification.
flutter buildand Gradle compile were not run (correctly out of scope per task instructions — nogradlewwrapper exists in this repo's Flutter-managed Android setup, and runningflutter buildwas explicitly disallowed for this verify pass). Kotlin correctness for the 3 alarm builder edits rests on code inspection only. This is expected and by design — Phase 4 (7 manual/on-device QA tasks, currently unchecked) is the actual human verification gate for the Kotlin notification rendering, tint fidelity, and status-bar legibility. This WARNING will remain open until a human completes Phase 4 before merge. NotificationCompat.setColor()is advisory-only (documented as an accepted Open Question in design.md) — tint fidelity across Android OS versions/OEM skins cannot be verified by static means and depends on the same Phase 4 on-device QA gate.
SUGGESTION
None — implementation is minimal, presentation-only, and precisely matches the spec-light scope declared in spec.md's own "Scope Note" section.
Phase 4 Gate Confirmation
Phase 4 (manual/on-device QA, 7 tasks: 4.1-4.7) is explicitly and correctly left unchecked ([ ]) in tasks.md, each annotated "SKIPPED (manual QA)". This is documented, not silently dropped — apply-progress explicitly states: "Phase 4 (manual/on-device QA, 7 sub-tasks) intentionally left unchecked — explicitly out of scope per apply task instructions; a human must complete it before merge." This matches spec.md's own scope note declaring the 3 Kotlin call sites as "Non-Normative... Verification is manual/on-device QA checklist... not automated spec scenarios."
Final Verdict
PASS WITH WARNINGS
- 0 CRITICAL
- 2 WARNING (both expected/by-design, tied to the documented Phase 4 human QA gate — not implementation defects)
- 0 SUGGESTION
The implementation is complete for all automatable scope (17/17 tasks), matches spec and design exactly across all 8 inspected source artifacts, both spec scenarios pass via live-executed tests, flutter analyze is clean, and the full 240-test suite has zero regressions. The only open item is the mandatory human Phase 4 on-device QA gate, which was correctly deferred rather than skipped silently. Safe to proceed to archive once Phase 4 QA is completed and recorded in the PR description, per the existing task 4.7 instruction.